FX-6130 vs i5-3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3470
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
2.95
+7.7%
FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.74

Core i5-3470 outperforms FX-6130 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16461692
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency3.632.73
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$184no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size132.8 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3470 and FX-6130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3470 and FX-6130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3470 and FX-6130 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3470 and FX-6130.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3470 2.95
+7.7%
FX-6130 2.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3470 4678
+7.5%
FX-6130 4353

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.95 2.74
Recency 1 June 2012 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 95 Watt

i5-3470 has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 23.4% lower power consumption.

FX-6130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-3470 and FX-6130.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3470 and FX-6130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3470
Core i5-3470
AMD FX-6130
FX-6130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5807 votes

Rate Core i5-3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3470 or FX-6130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.