Atom Z3740 vs i5-3340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3340M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.70
+336%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

Core i5-3340M outperforms Atom Z3740 by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20463005
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency4.6018.45
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$32

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3340M 1.70
+336%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3340M 2695
+334%
Atom Z3740 621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 0.39
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 1 January 2013 27 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

i5-3340M has a 335.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 53.2% faster integrated GPU.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores, and 1650% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3340M is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3340M and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3340M
Core i5-3340M
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 175 votes

Rate Core i5-3340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3340M or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.