Ryzen 7 6800U vs i5-3335S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3335S
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.38
Ryzen 7 6800U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.97
+445%

Ryzen 7 6800U outperforms Core i5-3335S by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1779580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency3.4781.83
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date1 November 2012 (12 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size160 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,480 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1155FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3335S 2.38
Ryzen 7 6800U 12.97
+445%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3335S 3778
Ryzen 7 6800U 20600
+445%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-3335S 563
Ryzen 7 6800U 1715
+205%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-3335S 1651
Ryzen 7 6800U 7424
+350%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 12.97
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 6800U has a 445% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 6800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3335S in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-3335S is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 6800U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3335S and Ryzen 7 6800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3335S
Core i5-3335S
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Ryzen 7 6800U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Core i5-3335S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 314 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3335S or Ryzen 7 6800U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.