Celeron M 430 vs i5-3317U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3317U
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.27
+1055%
Celeron M 430
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.11

Core i5-3317U outperforms Celeron M 430 by a whopping 1055% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22983377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Celeron M
Power efficiency7.070.39
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3317U 1.27
+1055%
Celeron M 430 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3317U 2019
+1095%
Celeron M 430 169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 0.11
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 27 Watt

i5-3317U has a 1054.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3317U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3317U and Celeron M 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3317U
Core i5-3317U
Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 308 votes

Rate Core i5-3317U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 27 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3317U or Celeron M 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.