Xeon L5410 vs i5-2540M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2540M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.49
+22.1%

Core i5-2540M outperforms Xeon L5410 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21472318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency4.032.31
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C57 °C
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2540M 1.49
+22.1%
Xeon L5410 1.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2540M 2362
+21.8%
Xeon L5410 1940

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.22
Recency 1 February 2011 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

i5-2540M has a 22.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2540M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-2540M is a notebook processor while Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2540M and Xeon L5410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2540M
Core i5-2540M
Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 539 votes

Rate Core i5-2540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 67 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2540M or Xeon L5410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.