Celeron G540 vs i5-2515E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2515E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.21
+59.2%
Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76

Core i5-2515E outperforms Celeron G540 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23482658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency3.211.09
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266$158

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors624 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA1023FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2515E 1.21
+59.2%
Celeron G540 0.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2515E 1882
+59.4%
Celeron G540 1181

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.76
Recency 1 February 2011 4 September 2011
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i5-2515E has a 59.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G540, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

The Core i5-2515E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-2515E is a notebook processor while Celeron G540 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2515E and Celeron G540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2515E
Core i5-2515E
Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Core i5-2515E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 106 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2515E or Celeron G540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.