Celeron J1850 vs i5-2500S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2500S
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.21
+256%

Core i5-2500S outperforms Celeron J1850 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18522788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.87no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.105.65
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz792 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2500S 2.21
+256%
Celeron J1850 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2500S 3382
+259%
Celeron J1850 942

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.21 0.62
Recency 9 January 2011 1 September 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

i5-2500S has a 256.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J1850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2500S is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2500S is a desktop processor while Celeron J1850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500S and Celeron J1850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2500S
Core i5-2500S
Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 101 vote

Rate Core i5-2500S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2500S or Celeron J1850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.