Turion X2 RM-75 vs i5-2500K
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1718 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.32 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Core i5 (Desktop) | 2x AMD Turion |
Power efficiency | 2.59 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Lion (2008−2009) |
Release date | 9 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $216 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4000 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 216 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,160 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA1155 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 9 January 2011 | 1 January 2009 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-2500K has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Turion X2 RM-75, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-2500K is a desktop processor while Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2500K and Turion X2 RM-75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.