Athlon MP 2100+ vs i5-2475M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)19 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0FSB
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s266 MT/s
Multiplier2613
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die size149 mm2128 mm2
Number of transistors624 Million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt66 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size16 GB4 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 66 Watt

i5-2475M has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 88.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i5-2475M is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2100+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2475M and Athlon MP 2100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2475M
Core i5-2475M
AMD Athlon MP 2100+
Athlon MP 2100+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-2475M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2475M or Athlon MP 2100+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.