Athlon 3000G vs i5-2400S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2400S
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.99
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+41.7%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i5-2400S by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19371681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.345.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency2.887.59
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)21 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$141$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 1450% better value for money than i5-2400S.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2000AMD Radeon Vega 3
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes166

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2400S 1.99
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+41.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2400S 3154
Athlon 3000G 4477
+41.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-2400S 505
Athlon 3000G 957
+89.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-2400S 1362
Athlon 3000G 1959
+43.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 2.82
Integrated graphics card 0.55 2.98
Recency 9 January 2011 21 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-2400S has 100% more physical cores.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 41.7% higher aggregate performance score, 441.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2400S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2400S and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2400S
Core i5-2400S
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 206 votes

Rate Core i5-2400S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2110 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2400S or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.