EPYC 7262 vs i5-13500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.02
+53.1%
EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.08

Core i5-13500 outperforms EPYC 7262 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.3110.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency29.137.98
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13500 has 542% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate154 MHzno data
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache80K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size257 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Socket1700SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 770N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500 20.02
+53.1%
EPYC 7262 13.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500 31794
+53%
EPYC 7262 20779

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.02 13.08
Recency 4 January 2023 7 August 2019
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

i5-13500 has a 53.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 75% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 138.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7262, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-13500 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7262 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500 and EPYC 7262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1289 votes

Rate Core i5-13500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500 or EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.