A10-9620P vs i5-13500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13500
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.02
+1151%
A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60

Core i5-13500 outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 1151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2832106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Power efficiency29.1310.09
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate154 MHzno data
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die size257 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1700FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13500 20.02
+1151%
A10-9620P 1.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13500 31794
+1153%
A10-9620P 2538

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13500 2427
+385%
A10-9620P 500

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13500 12292
+1005%
A10-9620P 1112

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13500 8875
+290%
A10-9620P 2277

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13500 49300
+564%
A10-9620P 7420

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13500 4.02
+258%
A10-9620P 14.41

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13500 28
+969%
A10-9620P 3

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13500 2405
+946%
A10-9620P 230

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13500 256
+256%
A10-9620P 72

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-13500 3.11
+284%
A10-9620P 0.81

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-13500 7704
+480%
A10-9620P 1329

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-13500 135
+725%
A10-9620P 16

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-13500 306
+299%
A10-9620P 77

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.02 1.60
Integrated graphics card 6.16 2.44
Recency 4 January 2023 1 January 2017
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

i5-13500 has a 1151.3% higher aggregate performance score, 152.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 250% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13500 is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13500 and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1289 votes

Rate Core i5-13500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13500 or A10-9620P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.