Ryzen 7 7840S vs i5-13490F
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-13490F outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 360 | 460 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 54.80 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 25.28 | 40.80 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 10 February 2023 (1 year ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $235 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 215 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1700 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.36 | 15.09 |
| Recency | 10 February 2023 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-13490F has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 25% more physical cores.
Ryzen 7 7840S, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-13490F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-13490F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13490F and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
