i7-13705H vs i5-13400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.83
+7.4%
Core i7-13705H
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
14.74

Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-13705H by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking432481
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency23.0531.00
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-H (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$196$502

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400F 15.83
+7.4%
i7-13705H 14.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400F 25138
+7.3%
i7-13705H 23418

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13400F 8689
i7-13705H 10476
+20.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13400F 51113
i7-13705H 61674
+20.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13400F 3.27
+704%
i7-13705H 26.3

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13400F 27
i7-13705H 32
+15.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400F 2364
i7-13705H 2869
+21.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400F 252
i7-13705H 274
+8.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-13400F 3.06
i7-13705H 3.21
+4.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-13400F 12.2
i7-13705H 12.7
+4.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400F 12095
i7-13705H 14323
+18.4%

Blender(-)

i5-13400F 206
+13.8%
i7-13705H 181

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400F 1792
i7-13705H 1841
+2.7%

7-Zip Single

i5-13400F 5743
i7-13705H 6000
+4.5%

7-Zip

i5-13400F 60048
i7-13705H 75165
+25.2%

WebXPRT 3

i5-13400F 294
i7-13705H 304
+3.2%

CrossMark Overall

i5-13400F 1941
+4.9%
i7-13705H 1851

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i5-13400F 254
i7-13705H 268
+5.3%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i5-13400F 336
+4.3%
i7-13705H 322

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.83 14.74
Physical cores 10 14
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i5-13400F has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score.

i7-13705H, on the other hand, has 40% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H.

Note that Core i5-13400F is a desktop processor while Core i7-13705H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13705H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
Intel Core i7-13705H
Core i7-13705H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3328 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 25 votes

Rate Core i7-13705H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400F or Core i7-13705H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.