Xeon Gold 5420+ vs i5-13400E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 95 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 59.38 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.92 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,848 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 52.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 1700 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5-4400 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 28 |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
i5-13400E has 215.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5420+, on the other hand, has 180% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-13400E is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5420+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400E and Xeon Gold 5420+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
