Xeon E-2276M vs i5-13400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.66
+97.3%
Xeon E-2276M
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.43

Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E-2276M by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking487980
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.9418.77
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E
Power efficiency21.3415.63
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 150% better value for money than Xeon E-2276M.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache80K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2149.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 730Intel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz1.2 GHz
Execution Units24no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.66
+97.3%
Xeon E-2276M 7.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23286
+97.2%
Xeon E-2276M 11806

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2298
+59.3%
Xeon E-2276M 1443

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10206
+97.4%
Xeon E-2276M 5170

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400 2358
+89.8%
Xeon E-2276M 1243

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400 257
+31.8%
Xeon E-2276M 195

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400 12107
+83.6%
Xeon E-2276M 6595

Blender(-)

i5-13400 206
Xeon E-2276M 384
+86.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400 1795
+37.8%
Xeon E-2276M 1303

7-Zip Single

i5-13400 5829
+11.8%
Xeon E-2276M 5214

7-Zip

i5-13400 59510
+75.1%
Xeon E-2276M 33994

WebXPRT 3

i5-13400 306
+39.1%
Xeon E-2276M 220

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.66 7.43
Integrated graphics card 4.16 6.40
Recency 4 January 2023 27 May 2019
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i5-13400 has a 97.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 66.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon E-2276M, on the other hand, has 53.8% faster integrated GPU, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2276M in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2276M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Xeon E-2276M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Xeon E-2276M
Xeon E-2276M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1091 vote

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate Xeon E-2276M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Xeon E-2276M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.