Ryzen 7 1700X vs i5-13400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.61
+48.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
9.86

Core i5-13400 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking484779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.333.60
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency21.279.82
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)2 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400 has 1131% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache80K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)16384 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1700AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA3
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
XFR-+
SenseMI-+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size192 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz-
Execution Units24-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hz-
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.5-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0n/a
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.61
+48.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X 9.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23203
+48.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X 15660

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2297
+109%
Ryzen 7 1700X 1100

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10194
+81.6%
Ryzen 7 1700X 5614

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-13400 8721
+87.1%
Ryzen 7 1700X 4662

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-13400 51095
+59.9%
Ryzen 7 1700X 31950

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13400 13632
+50.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X 9076

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-13400 3.47
+40.9%
Ryzen 7 1700X 4.89

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-13400 27
+61.4%
Ryzen 7 1700X 17

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400 2358
+53.4%
Ryzen 7 1700X 1537

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400 257
+66.9%
Ryzen 7 1700X 154

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-13400 3.1
+79.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X 1.73

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-13400 11.8
+31.8%
Ryzen 7 1700X 9

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-13400 136
+50.8%
Ryzen 7 1700X 90

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-13400 311
+72.8%
Ryzen 7 1700X 180

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-13400 7979
+114%
Ryzen 7 1700X 3728

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400 12107
+92.9%
Ryzen 7 1700X 6275

Blender(-)

i5-13400 206
Ryzen 7 1700X 327
+58.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400 1795
+92.6%
Ryzen 7 1700X 932

7-Zip Single

i5-13400 5829
+55.6%
Ryzen 7 1700X 3746

7-Zip

i5-13400 59510
+50.2%
Ryzen 7 1700X 39624

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.61 9.86
Recency 4 January 2023 2 March 2017
Physical cores 10 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

i5-13400 has a 48.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 25% more physical cores, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 7 1700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1078 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 739 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Ryzen 7 1700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.