Celeron J1750 vs i5-13400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking484not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency21.24no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm22 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data-
RSTno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz750 MHz
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported42

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23165
+3793%
Celeron J1750 595

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2023 1 September 2013
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

i5-13400 has an age advantage of 9 years, and 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1058 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.