i5-1335U vs i5-1250P

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-1250P
2022
12 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.16
+36.7%

Core i5-1250P outperforms Core i5-1335U by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking597814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency42.8658.54
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-P (2022)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date23 February 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$340

Detailed specifications

Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size217 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1744FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory size64 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligibleIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.4 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Units8080

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes208

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-1250P 13.16
+36.7%
i5-1335U 9.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-1250P 20144
+36.7%
i5-1335U 14739

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-1250P 7918
i5-1335U 9351
+18.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-1250P 38277
i5-1335U 40266
+5.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-1250P 11842
i5-1335U 12286
+3.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-1250P 9.58
i5-1335U 8.03
+19.3%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-1250P 10
i5-1335U 19
+95.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-1250P 1528
+4.4%
i5-1335U 1464

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-1250P 201
i5-1335U 238
+18.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-1250P 2.74
i5-1335U 2.97
+8.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-1250P 9.5
i5-1335U 9.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-1250P 80
i5-1335U 82
+2.8%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-1250P 201
i5-1335U 257
+27.8%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-1250P 5561
+7.4%
i5-1335U 5178

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-1250P 7672
i5-1335U 7856
+2.4%

Blender(-)

i5-1250P 511
+24.9%
i5-1335U 409

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-1250P 1622
i5-1335U 1669
+2.9%

7-Zip Single

i5-1250P 3532
i5-1335U 5171
+46.4%

7-Zip

i5-1250P 24625
i5-1335U 34186
+38.8%

WebXPRT 3

i5-1250P 254
i5-1335U 260
+2.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.16 9.63
Recency 23 February 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

i5-1250P has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

i5-1335U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-1250P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1335U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1250P and Core i5-1335U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-1250P
Core i5-1250P
Intel Core i5-1335U
Core i5-1335U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 30 votes

Rate Core i5-1250P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 567 votes

Rate Core i5-1335U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-1250P or Core i5-1335U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.