Core i9-11900F vs Core i5-11600K
Aggregate performance score
i9-11900F outperforms i5-11600K by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 578 | 486 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 57.52 | 43.76 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Rocket Lake (2021) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-11600K has 31% better value for money than i9-11900F.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 480 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA1200 | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 50 GB/s | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.68 | 14.46 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
i9-11900F has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i9-11900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-11600K in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11600K and Core i9-11900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
