Core i7-12700TE vs Core i5-11600K
Aggregate performance score
i5-11600K outperforms i7-12700TE by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 574 | 681 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 57.68 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Rocket Lake (2021) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 20 |
Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 480 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 25 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 215 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA1200 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | no data |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 50 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-12700TE by 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-12700TE by 17% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-12700TE by 27% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-12700TE by 18% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 12.68 | 10.88 |
Integrated graphics card | 3.05 | 6.15 |
Physical cores | 6 | 12 |
Threads | 12 | 20 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-11600K has a 16.5% higher aggregate performance score.
i7-12700TE, on the other hand, has 101.6% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-11600K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-12700TE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-11600K and Core i7-12700TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.