Atom Z3735G vs i5-10400F
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-10400F outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 1602% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 913 | 2886 |
| Place by popularity | 12 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 23.17 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 11.94 | 22.80 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | $17 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 112 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | UTFCBGA592 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 1 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 5.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 646 MHz |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.51 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 9 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
i5-10400F has a 1602% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-10400F is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10400F and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
