EPYC 4484PX vs i5-1038G7
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 126 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 47.67 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Ice Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.38 |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.41 | 1.98 |
| Recency | 4 May 2020 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 120 Watt |
i5-1038G7 has 173.2% faster integrated GPU, and 328.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-1038G7 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1038G7 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
