Ultra 9 288V vs i5-1034G1
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Core i5-1034G1 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1126 | 628 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 35.99 | 38.30 |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Arc 140V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.92 | 12.60 |
| Recency | 29 May 2019 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
i5-1034G1 has 100% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 112.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1034G1 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1034G1 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
