i3-N300 vs i5-10200H

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-10200H
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.14
Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.47
+6.4%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Core i5-10200H by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12001153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency10.7673.64
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date17 September 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.25 GHz
Execution Units1232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes169
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-10200H 5.14
i3-N300 5.47
+6.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-10200H 8127
i3-N300 8655
+6.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-10200H 842
+102%
i3-N300 416

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-10200H 172
+102%
i3-N300 85

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-10200H 3845
+43.8%
i3-N300 2674

Blender(-)

i5-10200H 515
i3-N300 1095
+113%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-10200H 1094
+74.8%
i3-N300 626

7-Zip Single

i5-10200H 4497
+87.1%
i3-N300 2403

7-Zip

i5-10200H 21148
+76.6%
i3-N300 11976

WebXPRT 3

i5-10200H 187
+79.6%
i3-N300 104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.14 5.47
Recency 17 September 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 7 Watt

i3-N300 has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-10200H and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-10200H
Core i5-10200H
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 189 votes

Rate Core i5-10200H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 75 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-10200H or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.