Processor N200 vs i3-L13G4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-L13G4
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
1.76
+12.8%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Core i3-L13G4 outperforms Processor N200 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20172107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency23.7924.61
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$193

Detailed specifications

Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads54
Base clock speed0.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-CSP1016Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX12no data
OpenGLOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes69

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-L13G4 1.76
+12.8%
Processor N200 1.56

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i3-L13G4 1349
Processor N200 1540
+14.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.76 1.56
Integrated graphics card 5.58 3.28
Physical cores 5 4
Threads 5 4
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

i3-L13G4 has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score, 70.1% faster integrated GPU, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-L13G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-L13G4 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-L13G4
Core i3-L13G4
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Core i3-L13G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-L13G4 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.