PRO A10-8750B vs i3-9100TE
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-9100TE outperforms PRO A10-8750B by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1631 | 1987 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 8.17 | 1.84 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
Release date | 1 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 29 September 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 126 mm2 | 245 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 2,411 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1151 | FM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
FRTC | - | + |
FreeSync | - | + |
PowerTune | - | + |
DualGraphics | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
RAID | - | + |
HSA | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-2133 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
Number of pipelines | no data | 512 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.02 | 1.85 |
Recency | 1 April 2019 | 29 September 2015 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
i3-9100TE has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-9100TE is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8750B in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100TE and PRO A10-8750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.