i5-9300H vs i3-7130U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7130U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.55
Core i5-9300H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.76
+86.7%

Core i5-9300H outperforms Core i3-7130U by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17481264
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Power efficiency16.0910.01
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$250

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeOPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2724
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s45.741 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 620Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory32 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7130U 2.55
i5-9300H 4.76
+86.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7130U 4055
i5-9300H 7559
+86.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-7130U 879
i5-9300H 1286
+46.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-7130U 1785
i5-9300H 3705
+108%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-7130U 4338
i5-9300H 6572
+51.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-7130U 9828
i5-9300H 24623
+151%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-7130U 3823
i5-9300H 8107
+112%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-7130U 284
i5-9300H 790
+178%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-7130U 111
i5-9300H 172
+55%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i3-7130U 1.7
i5-9300H 4.7
+176%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i3-7130U 2250
i5-9300H 5663
+152%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i3-7130U 19
i5-9300H 49
+161%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i3-7130U 100
i5-9300H 194
+93.3%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i3-7130U 6047
i5-9300H 15528
+157%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i3-7130U 2829
i5-9300H 3855
+36.2%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

i3-7130U 6782
i5-9300H 16911
+149%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

i3-7130U 3473
i5-9300H 5266
+51.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 4.76
Integrated graphics card 2.43 3.09
Recency 12 June 2017 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

i3-7130U has 200% lower power consumption.

i5-9300H, on the other hand, has a 86.7% higher aggregate performance score, 27.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i5-9300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-7130U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7130U and Core i5-9300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7130U
Core i3-7130U
Intel Core i5-9300H
Core i5-9300H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 120 votes

Rate Core i3-7130U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2588 votes

Rate Core i5-9300H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7130U or Core i5-9300H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.