Atom D525 vs i3-7102E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2069not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.21no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.20no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

Core i3-7102E and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Atom D525.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
+547%
Atom D525 402

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 21 June 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 13 Watt

i3-7102E has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-7102E and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 214 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.