A9-9420e vs i3-7102E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.62
+135%
A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.69

Core i3-7102E outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21412775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency6.174.38
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataBGA
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-7102E 1.62
+135%
A9-9420e 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
+135%
A9-9420e 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 0.69
Integrated graphics card 3.11 1.47
Recency 3 January 2017 1 June 2018
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

i3-7102E has a 134.8% higher aggregate performance score, 111.6% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9420e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7102E is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 150 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-7102E and A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.