Core 2 Extreme X7900 vs Core i3-7100H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7100H
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.20
+210%
Core 2 Extreme X7900
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.71

Core i3-7100H outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7900 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18472707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core 2 Extreme
Power efficiency5.841.50
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-H (2017)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393$851

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size126 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1V-1.375V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1440PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7100H 2.20
+210%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7100H 3430
+211%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 1104

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-7100H 4870
+61.2%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 3022

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-7100H 11172
+93.8%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 5764

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-7100H 4231
+72.8%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 2449

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-7100H 15.9
+95.3%
Core 2 Extreme X7900 31.05

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.20 0.71
Recency 3 January 2017 1 September 2007
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 44 Watt

i3-7100H has a 209.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7100H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X7900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7100H and Core 2 Extreme X7900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7100H
Core i3-7100H
Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
Core 2 Extreme X7900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Core i3-7100H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7100H or Core 2 Extreme X7900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.