Celeron G3900E vs i3-6320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6320
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.87
+121%
Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.30

Core i3-6320 outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16722276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.520.12
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency5.233.45
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)2 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$157$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-6320 has 333% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3924
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics 510
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6320 2.87
+121%
Celeron G3900E 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6320 4473
+120%
Celeron G3900E 2034

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.87 1.30
Integrated graphics card 2.59 1.61
Recency 1 September 2015 2 January 2016
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 35 Watt

i3-6320 has a 120.8% higher aggregate performance score, 60.9% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 45.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-6320 is a desktop processor while Celeron G3900E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6320 and Celeron G3900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6320
Core i3-6320
Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 83 votes

Rate Core i3-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6320 or Celeron G3900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.