FX-9800P vs i3-6100TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100TE
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.02
+23.9%
FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.63

Core i3-6100TE outperforms FX-9800P by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19242089
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.3610.09
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB320 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size98.57 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FP4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100TE 2.02
+23.9%
FX-9800P 1.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100TE 3152
+23.9%
FX-9800P 2543

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-6100TE 943
+90.1%
FX-9800P 496

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-6100TE 1917
+71.3%
FX-9800P 1119

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 1.63
Integrated graphics card 2.59 1.95
Recency 12 October 2015 31 May 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

i3-6100TE has a 23.9% higher aggregate performance score, 32.8% faster integrated GPU, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9800P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more physical cores, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6100TE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100TE and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100TE
Core i3-6100TE
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-6100TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100TE or FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.