i7-11700F vs i3-6100E

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.13
Core i7-11700F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.47
+532%

Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i3-6100E by a whopping 532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1877562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency5.6519.25
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100E 2.13
i7-11700F 13.47
+532%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100E 3315
i7-11700F 21002
+534%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 13.47
Recency 12 October 2015 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i3-6100E has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i7-11700F, on the other hand, has a 532.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i7-11700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-6100E is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100E and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 959 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100E or Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.