Ultra 7 265K vs i3-6100E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.16
+1678%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Core i3-6100E by a whopping 1678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking189288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2494.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency5.6227.99
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265K has 39192% better value for money than i3-6100E.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size98.57 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors1750 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100E 2.09
Ultra 7 265K 37.16
+1678%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100E 3315
Ultra 7 265K 59029
+1681%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 37.16
Recency 12 October 2015 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

i3-6100E has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 1678% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-6100E is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100E and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 81 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100E or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.