Celeron M 743 vs i3-6006U
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2173 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 70 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Celeron M |
Power efficiency | 9.06 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
Release date | 10 November 2016 (7 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Bus type | OPI | no data |
Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 800 MHz |
Multiplier | 20 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1356 | BGA965 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 520 | no data |
Max video memory | 32 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 10 November 2016 | 1 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
i3-6006U has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6006U and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.