Ryzen 7 2700 vs i3-550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-550
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.01
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.88
+878%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i3-550 by a whopping 878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2446777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.068.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency1.3114.38
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 13933% better value for money than i3-550.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video HD+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-550 1.01
Ryzen 7 2700 9.88
+878%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-550 1611
Ryzen 7 2700 15699
+874%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-550 428
Ryzen 7 2700 1119
+161%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-550 869
Ryzen 7 2700 5528
+536%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 9.88
Recency 30 May 2010 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700 has a 878.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-550 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-550
Core i3-550
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 424 votes

Rate Core i3-550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3091 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-550 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.