Celeron M U3400 vs i3-530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.22no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s2500 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 24 May 2010
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 18 Watt

i3-530 has 100% more threads.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 305.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-530 is a desktop processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-530 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 439 votes

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-530 or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.