Celeron N6211 vs i3-5157U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-5157U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
1.63
+15.6%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Core i3-5157U outperforms Celeron N6211 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20772198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency5.5120.53
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size133 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1900 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Graphics 6100Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-5157U 1.63
+15.6%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-5157U 2593
+15.5%
Celeron N6211 2245

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-5157U 2
+47.9%
Celeron N6211 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-5157U 259
+102%
Celeron N6211 128

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-5157U 98
+28.9%
Celeron N6211 76

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i3-5157U 1.16
+19.6%
Celeron N6211 0.97

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 1.41
Integrated graphics card 2.32 1.39
Recency 1 March 2015 17 July 2022
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 6 Watt

i3-5157U has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, 66.9% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-5157U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-5157U is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-5157U and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-5157U
Core i3-5157U
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Core i3-5157U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-5157U or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.