Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i3-4160T

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4160T
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.96
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
39.35
+1908%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-4160T by a whopping 1908% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking193567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2553.86
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency5.3031.03
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 21444% better value for money than i3-4160T.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s64K (per core)
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size177 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C47 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe versionUp to 3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4160T 1.96
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+1908%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4160T 3113
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62508
+1908%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4160T 938
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2930
+212%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4160T 1849
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 19694
+965%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 39.35
Integrated graphics card 1.35 4.42
Recency 21 July 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

i3-4160T has 242.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D, on the other hand, has a 1907.7% higher aggregate performance score, 227.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4160T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4160T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4160T
Core i3-4160T
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 46 votes

Rate Core i3-4160T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1383 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4160T or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.