Celeron 7305 vs Core i3-4150
Aggregate performance score
i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 7305 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1779 | 2059 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.43 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| Release date | 1 May 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 5 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 464 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 3.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | BGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4400 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 7305 by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 7305 by 43% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.20 | 1.54 |
| Recency | 1 May 2014 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 5 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 15 Watt |
i3-4150 has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron 7305, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 260% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 7305 in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-4150 is a desktop processor while Celeron 7305 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4150 and Celeron 7305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
