i9-12900K vs i3-4130

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4130
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.09
Core i9-12900K
2021
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
26.08
+1148%

Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i3-4130 by a whopping 1148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1891191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4537.32
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Power efficiency3.6419.64
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-12900K has 8193% better value for money than i3-4130.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rate5 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size177 mm2215.25 mm2"
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1212
OpenGL4.34.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K.

PCIe versionUp to 3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4130 2.09
i9-12900K 26.08
+1148%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4130 3318
i9-12900K 41433
+1149%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4130 1017
i9-12900K 2647
+160%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4130 1981
i9-12900K 15552
+685%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 26.08
Integrated graphics card 1.35 6.16
Recency 1 September 2013 4 November 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 125 Watt

i3-4130 has 131.5% lower power consumption.

i9-12900K, on the other hand, has a 1147.8% higher aggregate performance score, 356.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-12900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4130 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4130 and Core i9-12900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4130
Core i3-4130
Intel Core i9-12900K
Core i9-12900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1012 votes

Rate Core i3-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1617 votes

Rate Core i9-12900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4130 or Core i9-12900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.