Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs i3-4102E

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Mobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date4 September 2013 (11 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nmno data
Die size118 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1364754
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 81 Watt

i3-4102E has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 224% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4102E and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4102E
Core i3-4102E
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Core i3-4102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4102E or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.