FX-8100 vs i3-4020Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4020Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
0.94
FX-8100
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+177%

FX-8100 outperforms Core i3-4020Y by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25131733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency7.592.54
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache3 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4200no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2561x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4020Y 0.94
FX-8100 2.60
+177%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4020Y 1463
FX-8100 4055
+177%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4020Y 458
+11.4%
FX-8100 411

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4020Y 874
FX-8100 1819
+108%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 2.60
Recency 1 September 2013 12 October 2011
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 95 Watt

i3-4020Y has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 763.6% lower power consumption.

FX-8100, on the other hand, has a 176.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The FX-8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4020Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-4020Y is a notebook processor while FX-8100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4020Y and FX-8100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4020Y
Core i3-4020Y
AMD FX-8100
FX-8100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 11 votes

Rate Core i3-4020Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 62 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4020Y or FX-8100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.