i9-14900K vs i3-380M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
Core i9-14900K
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.85
+4947%

Core i9-14900K outperforms Core i3-380M by a whopping 4947% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking264681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data61.51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.0328.66
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date26 October 2010 (14 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.53 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.53 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency667 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380M 0.75
i9-14900K 37.85
+4947%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380M 1199
i9-14900K 60127
+4915%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-380M 331
i9-14900K 3080
+831%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-380M 648
i9-14900K 20663
+3089%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-380M 2808
i9-14900K 12643
+350%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-380M 6554
i9-14900K 94801
+1346%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-380M 2699
i9-14900K 22773
+744%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-380M 20
i9-14900K 2.07
+866%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-380M 2
i9-14900K 72
+3373%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 37.85
Integrated graphics card 0.77 6.15
Recency 26 October 2010 17 October 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

i3-380M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i9-14900K, on the other hand, has a 4946.7% higher aggregate performance score, 698.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-14900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-380M is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380M and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380M
Core i3-380M
Intel Core i9-14900K
Core i9-14900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 461 vote

Rate Core i3-380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1710 votes

Rate Core i9-14900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380M or Core i9-14900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.