Xeon Max 9480 vs i3-350M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.69
Xeon Max 9480
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
55.24
+7906%

Xeon Max 9480 outperforms Core i3-350M by a whopping 7906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking271624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency1.8614.87
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130$12,980

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads4112
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81+114 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGAno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketBGA1288,PGA9884677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.69
Xeon Max 9480 55.24
+7906%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-350M 1086
Xeon Max 9480 87420
+7950%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 55.24
Recency 7 January 2010 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 4 112
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

i3-350M has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Max 9480, on the other hand, has a 7905.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 2700% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Max 9480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-350M is a notebook processor while Xeon Max 9480 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Xeon Max 9480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
Intel Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 264 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Max 9480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Xeon Max 9480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.