A4-9125 SoC vs i3-350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-370M Core i3-380M Core i5-520M Core i5-560M Core i7-620M Core i7-640M
VS
A4-9120 A4-9120C A4-9120e SoC A4-9125 SoC A6-9200 SoC A6-9210 A6-9220 A6-9220C A6-9220e A6-9225 A9-9410 A9-9420 A9-9420e A9-9425 E2-9000 E2-9010

Contents

i3-350M i3-350M
A4-9125 SoC A4-9125 SoC

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2733not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency1.84no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81+114 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGAno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsRadeon R3 2CU
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Pros & cons summary

Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

i3-350M has 100% more threads.

A4-9125 SoC, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and A4-9125 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
AMD A4-9125 SoC
A4-9125 SoC
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-350M Core i3 350M
vs
Pentium B980 Pentium B980
A4-9125 SoC A4 9125 SoC
vs
A4-9120e SoC A4 9120e SoC
i3-350M Core i3 350M
vs
A4 Micro-6400T A4 Micro 6400T
i5-7600K Core i5 7600K
vs
i3-10325 Core i3 10325
i7-960 Core i7 960
vs
PRO A10-8770E PRO A10 8770E
Core 2 Quad Q9550 Core 2 Quad Q9550
vs
Sempron 140 Sempron 140
Core 2 Duo E6850 Core 2 Duo E6850
vs
Pentium III 800 Pentium III 800
i7-620LM Core i7 620LM
vs
i5-8300H Core i5 8300H
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 FX-62
vs
Celeron N4120 Celeron N4120
Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T8300
vs
Atom Z3740 Atom Z3740
Pentium Dual T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4300
vs
Ryzen 7 4800H Ryzen 7 4800H
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+
vs
Pentium D 830 Pentium D 830
Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+
vs
Pentium D 840 Pentium D 840

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 266 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 39 votes

Rate A4-9125 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or A4-9125 SoC, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.