Celeron N4100 vs i3-3240T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3240T
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.29
Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.55
+20.2%

Celeron N4100 outperforms Core i3-3240T by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22742119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.4924.45
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 deg C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key-+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3240T 1.29
Celeron N4100 1.55
+20.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3240T 2046
Celeron N4100 2457
+20.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3240T 457
+47.9%
Celeron N4100 309

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3240T 984
+19.3%
Celeron N4100 825

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 1.55
Integrated graphics card 0.69 0.87
Recency 3 September 2012 11 December 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4100 has a 20.2% higher aggregate performance score, 26.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240T in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-3240T is a desktop processor while Celeron N4100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240T and Celeron N4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240T
Core i3-3240T
Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 11 votes

Rate Core i3-3240T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 431 vote

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240T or Celeron N4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.