Celeron M 390 vs i3-3240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 21 Watt

i3-3240 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 161.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-3240 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 390 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240
Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1168 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240 or Celeron M 390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.