Celeron G3950 vs i3-3240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.46
Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.46

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21762177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.622.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.512.71
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 8% better value for money than i3-3240.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key-+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3240 1.46
Celeron G3950 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3240 2327
+0.2%
Celeron G3950 2322

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.69 1.85
Recency 3 September 2012 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 51 Watt

i3-3240 has 100% more threads.

Celeron G3950, on the other hand, has 168.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 7.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240 and Celeron G3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240
Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1229 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240 or Celeron G3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.